Legal Opinion
United States v. Jerome Williams, United States of America v. Zachary Marshall, United States of America v. Darryl Price
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1996No. 95-2170, 95-2171, 95-2173PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Zachary Marshall, Darryl Price, and Jerome Williams appeal their convictions under the Federal Kidnapping Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) (1994), for kidnapping Richard Harris and conspiracy to kidnap him. All three defendants claim that the district court 1 erred in excluding evidence of a polygraph test conducted on the government’s chief witness, Michael Campbell. They also claim that the court erred in admitting evi dence of their possession of guns before and after the conspiracy. Williams makes a similar argument regarding evidence of his possession of drugs.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Reginald Pierre Beasley, United States of America v. Oliver Lawrence BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. CordobaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.