Legal Opinion

Matter of Welfare of SAC

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1995No. C9-94-2176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

529 N.W.2d 517 (1995)

In the Matter of the WELFARE OF S.A.C., a juvenile.

No. C9-94-2176.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 11, 1995.

Susan Gaertner, Ramsey County Atty., Mark J. Ponsolle, Eric P. Johnson, Tamara L. McConkey, Asst. County Attys., St. Paul, for appellant County.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Charlann E. Winking, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for respondent S.A.C.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and NORTON and MANSUR, JJ.

OPINION

MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.[*]

The state appeals from the district court order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a delinquency…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Carlson v. LilyerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. London Construction Co. v. Roseville Townhomes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of L.G.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. RSUI Indemnity Company v. New Horizon Kids Quest, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API