Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Lilyerd
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 19, 1989No. CX-89-1071PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The trial court concluded that a statute requiring an offer of first refusal to the immediately preceding former owner of agricultural land when that land is sold did not apply to the instant case, and that appellants were not “the immediately preceding former owners” of certain agricultural laud under that statute. Appellants allege both conclusions are error. In light of a recent statutory amendment and an insufficient record, we remand.
FACTS
In 1973 Big Meadow Ranch, Inc., a Minnesota corporation of which appellant J. Ralph Lilyerd was president and a shareholder and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dahl v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Lilyerd v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Preston v. JungeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Halverson (In Re Solberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Ludowese v. RedmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.