Legal Opinion
London Construction Co. v. Roseville Townhomes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1991No. C9-91-168PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Rossini & Associates, P.A. appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of London Construction Company. Rossini & Associates contends that it is entitled to a mechanics’ lien for legal services provided for a commercial development.
FACTS
Appellant Rossini & Associates, P.A. provided legal services for the commercial development of a condominium complex, and helped the owner acquire financing. The owner of the property failed to make its mortgage payments and defaulted. Thereafter, appellant filed a mechanics’ lien.
London Construction moved for summary judgment. After…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- McClain v. BegleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Certificate of Need for Construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage InstallationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. M.B.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Matter of Welfare of SACCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Premier Investments v. Suites of America, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.