Legal Opinion

Coard v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 11, 1980No. [Nos. 78, 95, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

September Term, 1979.]

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari in these cases to determine the proper standard of proof to be applied in commitment proceedings involving persons found not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the commission of a crime. When the cases were tried, the statutory standard of proof in commitment proceedings was a preponderance of the evidence. See Williams v. Superintendent, 43 Md. App. 588, 593, 406 A.2d 1302, 1305-06. The lower courts found that the committees in these cases had been properly committed under the preponderance standard. In No. 95, the Court of Special Appeals reversed the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Superintendent, Clifton T. Perkins Hospital CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Coard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. 1986 Mercedes Benz 560 Ce Vin: WDBCA45DGA211147 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Baltimore Teachers Union v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. SybertCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Borchardt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API