Legal Opinion

1986 Mercedes Benz 560 Ce Vin: WDBCA45DGA211147 v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 1994No. 57, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

This case requires us to construe and then apply Maryland Code (1957,1992 Repl.Vol.) Art. 27, § 297(1). 1 Specifically, we must decide whether, in this case, the State is entitled to the benefit of the presumption that the motor vehicle, which is the subject of the forfeiture proceedings, is forfeitable as proceeds 2 of drug activity. 3 If we determine that it is — that the State has established the necessary prerequisites by the prescribed level of proof — then we must decide whether the claimant of the property, in this case, the registered owner, Troy Bowers (“Bowers”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Stone v. Essex County Newspapers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aravanis v. Somerset CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Medlock v. One 1985 Jeep Cherokee Vin 1JCWB7828FT129001Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Boyd v. HickmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. ACandS, Inc. v. AsnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API