Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1985No. 544, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

In 1984, the General Assembly rewrote the State insanity law. In doing so, it changed some of the procedures by which “insanity acquittees” (persons charged with crime but excused from criminal responsibility by reason of insanity) could seek and obtain release from judicially-ordered commitment to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH). The questions before us in this appeal are whether the Legislature intended those changes to apply to persons who, like appellant, were committed prior to the effective date of the new law, and, if so, whether such application would…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Berman v. KarvounisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Bergstein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API