Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Sybert

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 1982No. 718, September Term, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiss, J.

This appeal arises out of a declaration filed by Sybert, Sybert and Nippard, the appellees herein, all of whom are attorneys at law duly qualified to practice their profession in the State of Maryland, against the appellant, Atlantic Richfield Company (hereinafter Arco), a Pennsylvania corporation duly qualified to do business in the State of Maryland. The suit, filed in the Circuit Court for Howard County, alleged a claim for real estate commissions arising out of the negotiation of a contract of sale between Arco and Belvoir Terminals Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Citadel…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Keener v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. In Re KampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Jones v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  5. Crest Investment Trust, Inc. v. ComstockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. SybertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Stewart Title of the Midwest, Inc. v. Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Alamria v. Telcor International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  5. Loyola Federal Savings Bank v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API