Horowitz v. Kuehl
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for 'King county, Dykeman, J., entered April 6,1920, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant, Horowitz, brought this action against the respondents, Kuehl, Wood and Penny, to recover upon a promissory note, payable to himself or to his order, in the sum of two hundred *17and twenty-five dollars. The respondents answered, admitting the execution and delivery of the note and its nonpayment, and as an affirmative defense and cross-complaint, alleged that the note, together with one hundred dollars in cash, was given to the appellant as the purchase price for the exclusive right to use the trade name of “National Musicians’ Directory Co.,” and the exclusive right to publish a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stanton v. ZercherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Fischer v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Sowles v. FleetwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
- Gray v. Wikstrom Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Andrews v. Standard Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Shook v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.