Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Consolidated Edison Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

Motion by plaintiffs for an order restraining and enjoining the defendants pending the trial and determination of this action from carrying on certain acts which will be more fully referred to herein.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in April, 1940, and thereafter an amended complaint was served in July, 1940. No answer has as yet been served by the defendants, inasmuch as the time to answer has not as yet expired. Defendants have moved for a bill of particulars among other things, and an order has been entered thereon, but the plaintiffs have not as yet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. GittoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Rice & Adams Corp. v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Food & Grocery Bureau of Southern California, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
  5. Owsley v. YerkesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Johns-ManvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
  2. Fein v. Security Banknote CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. H. M. Chandler Co. v. Penn Paper Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  4. Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher WorkmenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API