Legal Opinion
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 27, 1953No. Civ. No. 2343PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced action against defendants, seeking an injunction, forfeiture of corporate franchises and damages. At the hearing of plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction defendants moved for summary judgment or that the action be dismissed on the grounds that (1) the Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter, and (2) that plaintiff’s complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
On account of the importance of the case, the Court permitted the entire matter to be gone into very fully. Twenty-two witnesses were subpoenaed and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Columbia River Packers Assn., Inc. v. HintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Afran Transport Company v. National Maritime UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Pocket Books, Inc. v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
- Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local Union No. 114, AFLCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953