John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
Frank Didomenico and M. T. Negley, a copartnership trading as Didomenico and Negley, applied to the Penn sylvania Public Utility Commission for a certificate of public convenience authorizing them to transport “heavy or bulky property which requires the use of a truck equipped with winch or other loading device, between points within the city of Pittsburgh and within a radius of 40 miles .......” and “between points within the city of Pittsburgh to points within 75 miles, when occasion requires the hauling of such heavy or bulky property.” Protests against granting the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beaver Valley Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- York Express Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Steward v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- H. J. Gongaware & Sons v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.