Legal Opinion

Heil Co. v. Crowley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1995No. 1931287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, the Heil Company ("Heil"), appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Crowley, based on Crowley's claim that he was fired in retaliation for his filing a claim for workers' compensation benefits.

The issues in this case are: (1) whether Crowley offered substantial evidence to show a discharge in retaliation for his filing the workers' compensation claim; (2) whether Crowley presented clear and convincing evidence entitling him to punitive damages; and (3) if so, whether the punitive damages award was excessive.

Viewing the facts in a light most…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Christiansen v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. AutoZone, Inc. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. ConAgra, Inc. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Mercy Medical v. GrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API