Heil Co. v. Crowley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, the Heil Company ("Heil"), appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Crowley, based on Crowley's claim that he was fired in retaliation for his filing a claim for workers' compensation benefits.
The issues in this case are: (1) whether Crowley offered substantial evidence to show a discharge in retaliation for his filing the workers' compensation claim; (2) whether Crowley presented clear and convincing evidence entitling him to punitive damages; and (3) if so, whether the punitive damages award was excessive.
Viewing the facts in a light most…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Christiansen v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- AutoZone, Inc. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- ConAgra, Inc. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Mercy Medical v. GrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004