Feder v. Epstein
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing to amend a judgment. The judgment in question provided that the plaintiff have and recover from Samuel Epstein, the defendant served, a certain sum of money. The further facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This was an action to recover the value of certain goods, wares, and merchandise, alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendants.
The complaint was entitled “ Moses M. Feder, plaintiff, against Samuel Epstein and Wolf Epstein, partners, under the firm name of Epstein Brothers, defendants.” It was alleged that the defendants “ have been and now are partners under the firm name aforesaid,” and the prayer was for “judgment against said defendants,” etc.
The summons had the same title as the complaint, and then followed: “The people of the state of California send greeting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davidson v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- MacLay Company v. MeadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Henry v. WillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Collins v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.