Collins v. Gray
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Riverside County refusing a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial. An appeal from the judgment was also taken and the judgment was affirmed by the district court of appeal for the second district. (Collins v. Gray, 3 Cal. App. 723, [86 Pac. 983].)
The object of the action was to establish the plaintiff’s right to the use of a pipe-line extending through the defendant’s land for the purpose of carrying water therein to the land of the plaintiff. It is contended upon this appeal that certain of the findings are not supported by sufficient evidence.
The complaint alleges that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- House v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Sherman v. SandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lillis v. Emigrant Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Auld v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Fulton v. HanlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Forestier v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re Estate of FunkensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Estate of LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Drainage DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.