Karaskiewicz v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs Thomas Karaskiewicz and Karas Clinic, P.C., and George Dey, Jr., and George Dey, Jr., D.C.P.C., appeal as of right from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of defendant, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM). The present action arises out of BCBSM’s refusal to pay for certain services performed by plaintiffs, chiropractors and their chiropractic professional corporations, pursuant to Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan’s Series A77 Group Health Care Benefit Certificate (A77).
BCBSM maintains a unique relationship with persons seeking contractual health care benefits…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MICH. v. Insurance Comm'rMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Belmont v. Forest Hills Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jensen v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ripley v. RipleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cotter v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Longley v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tagliati v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Overall v. KadellaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.