Michael Fazio v. Washington Mutual Fa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Michael A. Fazio and Kim M. Fazio appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and other federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Kwan v. SanMedica Int’l, 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the Fazios’ FDCPA claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1692e because the Fazios failed to allege facts sufficient to show that JPMorgan…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kwan v. SanMedica InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.