Legal Opinion

Straub v. B.M.T. Ex Rel. Todd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1994No. 10S04-9412-JV-1284PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*598ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Francine Todd wanted to have a child, but she did not want to be married. She and Edward Straub signed an agreement providing that Edward Straub would not be responsible for supporting any child the two might procreate. B.M.T. was born in the wake of this agreement. When Straub offered this agreement as a defense to a claim for child support, the trial court held it void. When the validity of that agreement was before the Indiana Court of Appeals, it provoked a debate about the public policy surrounding a parent’s child support obligation. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Matter of LawranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Glasgo v. GlasgoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Continental Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Holloway v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API