Legal Opinion

Margaret Kosarko v. William A. Padula, Administrator of the Estate of Daniel L. Herndobler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2012No. 45S03-1206-CT-310PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff in this case, Margaret Ko-sarko, challenges the trial court’s denial of her motion for prejudgment interest following a jury verdict awarding her monetary damages. We reverse and hold that the Tort Prejudgment Interest Statute abrogates and supplants the common law prejudgment interest rules in cases covered by the statute.

On February 17, 2007, Kosarko filed a complaint for damages against Daniel Herndobler for injuries she allegedly sustained in an automobile collision involving Herndobler. When Herndobler subsequently passed away, Kosarko amended her…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoperIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Fell v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. The Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Roderick J. Sawyer, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kathy Inman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. SCI Propane, LLC v. FrederickIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Hassan Alsheik v. Alice Guerrero, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of I.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Abigail Elizabeth Freeman Jacks, a minor, by next friends Jennifer Jacks and William Scott Freeman, and Jennifer Jacks, and Jennifer Edwards v. Tipton Community School CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API