Legal Opinion

Hamaker v. Kenwel-Jackson MacHine, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1986No. 15152PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

The user of a notching machine brought an action against the corporate successor of the notcher’s original manufacturer for injuries sustained while using the machine. The trial court granted summary judgment for the corporate successor, and the user appeals. We affirm.

Statement of Facts

On March 6, 1981, appellant Carolyn M. Hamaker (Hamaker), sustained injuries while operating a notcher machine incident to her employment at Dakota Pallets and Wood Products, Inc., in Alcester, South Dakota. She caught her left hand in the notcher blade and severed the second, third, fourth,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API