Legal Opinion

People v. Reese

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1934No. Docket No. 2291PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal of the defendants is from judgments of conviction against- each of them, and from orders denying their motions for new trial. They were both convicted by verdicts of the jury on an indictment against them, including one charge of conspiracy, ten counts of grand theft, and six counts of violation of the Corporate Securities Act.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment as to each of the several counts on which the defendants were convicted of the crime of grand theft is challenged. In that connection, an inspection of the record reveals the fact that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. MacECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. YantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Epstein v. Hollywood Entertainment District II Business Improvement DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API