Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. MacE

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1925No. Docket No. 802PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The false pretenses alleged in the indictment are that the defendant “did . . . pretend and represent to the said H. L. Preston that he, the said R. D. Mace, wanted to borrow from him, the said H. L. Preston, the sum of twelve hundred dollars, for the purpose of making a final payment upon a certain X-ray machine, and certain medical and surgical instruments, then and there in the possession of him, the said R. D. Mace; that he, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. People v. WymerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. HenningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. People v. HaskinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. BradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. BradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. RandonoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API