Legal Opinion

People v. Green

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1913No. Crim. No. 411PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz' County and from an order refusing a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. T. S. Minot, A. A. Moore, and Stanley Moore, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of obtaining money by .false pretenses, and sentenced to serve a term of seven years in the state prison. This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The indictment and conviction were had under section 532 of the Penal Code, defining the offense of obtaining the property of- another by false pretenses, and providing for the punishment thereof.

For a clear understanding of the case a narrative of the transactions leading up to the commission of the alleged offense is necessary.

One…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WasservogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. DobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Nuffer v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API