Legal Opinion
United States v. Winona Chimal
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 24, 1992No. 91-2223PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Winona Chimal was charged with eleven counts of embezzlement from an Indian tribe. 18 U.S.C. § 1163. She was convicted on two counts, acquitted on one count, and the district court declared a mistrial on the remaining counts because the jury could not agree. Defendant appeals, raising the following points of error: (1) the government failed to prove a corpus delicti; (2) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to impeach Defendant with her pre-arrest silence; (3) the prosecutor’s alleged misstatement of the law of double jeopardy during…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Abu AliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lonnie Ray WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jerry v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.