Legal Opinion
United States v. Williamson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1995No. Nos. 93-3389, 93-3399, 94-3026 and 94-3053PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Carl Marshall, Clarissa Williamson, Edward Dryden, Jr., and Karen Parker (collectively “defendants”), were convicted of various drug related offenses. On appeal, they assert infirmities with their respective convictions and sentences. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On May 6, 1993, a federal grand jury in Kansas City, Kansas, returned an eight count indictment charging seven individuals1 with *1507conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, commonly referred to as “crack” cocaine, in violation of 21…
2Cases cited121 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- United States v. Brian L. Miller, United States of America v. Michael Ray HicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. LefflerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Gary Lee Davis v. Executive Director of Department of Corrections, as Head of the Department of Corrections, Ari ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.