Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1993No. Nos. 92-5008, 92-5016, 92-5017 and 92-5021PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Robert Earl Johnson, Charles Edwin Nottingham, Gerald Lee Carroll, and Dee Dee Romo, also known as Deidre Harrell,1 appeal their convictions for conspiracy to commit bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1988), and bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) (1988); id. § 2(b) (1988).2 Mr. Johnson and Mr. Carroll were also convicted of possessing a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West Supp. 1993). Defendants appeal their convictions and sentences on various grounds.3 We affirm the convictions and remand for resen-tencing of Mr. Nottingham…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlos Saro, United States of America v. Cornelio Cabrera-BaezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Saiz v. OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API