Legal Opinion

Cranberry Growers Service, Inc. v. Town of Duxbury

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We hold that a town conservation commission may not lease property held in its care, custody, management, and control without a town meeting vote authorizing the lease.

The plaintiff brought this action in November, 1990, seeking a determination that it had a valid lease from the Dux-*355bury conservation commission granting it the right until 2000 to farm cranberry bogs (premises) that the inhabitants of Duxbury had purchased for conservation purposes pursuant to town meeting authorization. The inhabitants of the town acquired the larger portion of the premises for conservation purposes by a 1971…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monadnock Display Fireworks, Inc. v. Town of AndoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Doris v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Ballantine v. Town of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Elbe File & Binder Co. v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Selectmen v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Ballerino v. BallerinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of WoburnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  4. Anglo Fabrics Co. v. Town of WebsterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
  5. Corcoran Management Co. v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API