Legal Opinion

Ballerino v. Ballerino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 22, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A judge in the Probate and Family Court granted the plaintiffs, the paternal grandparents of the minor female child of the defendant, visitation with the child. The judgment entered on the complaint of the plaintiffs for such visitation under G. L. c. 119, § 39D, the so-called grandparent visitation statute.3 The defendant thereafter filed a motion under Mass. R. Civ. P. 52 (b), as *1006amended, 423 Mass. 1402 (1996), and'Mass. R. Civ. R 59 (e), 365 Mass. 827 (1974), to amend the judgment or, in the alternative, for a new trial.4 The motion asserted, for the first time, that G. L. c. 119, § 39D,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J & S Insulation, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Galvin v. Welsh Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Opinions of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adoption of YvetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  2. Zora Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. StrykerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API