Legal Opinion
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of Woburn
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 11, 1998No. 97-12700-JLTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
TAURO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Sprint Spectrum L.P., (“Sprint”) is a communications venture seeking to provide a national wireless communications network using a new type of digital technology called Personal Communication Services (“PCS”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants, City of Woburn, and City Council Members Bryan Melanson, John J. Beauchamp, Anthony M. Imperioso, and Kevin R. McDonough violated the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, (the “TCA”), 47 U.S.C. .§ 322(e) and state law by denying the plaintiffs application for a special permit to construct a tower necessary for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. City of SouthfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, L.P. v. Township of Nether ProvidenceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002