State v. Clayton
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
The defendants, Heal and Clayton, in the Fourth judicial district, by information, were jointly charged with the crime of embezzlement. They were tried separately; each defendant being represented by different counsel. Both were convicted, and both appeal. Each filed and presented to this court a separate and complete record of the cause. There is no substantial difference in the records. Separate briefs were filed in each case. The Clayton Case was filed first in this court. The two cases, however, were argued and submitted together at the same time and at the same term.
Both defendants…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. CoblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. UglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. FloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. HealUtah Supreme Court · 1932