Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1956No. 8396Published

1Opinion of the Court

5 Utah 2d 187 (1956)

299 P.2d 622

J. HENSLEY COTTRELL, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

GRAND UNION TEA COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND C.E. POPE, DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

No. 8396.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 16, 1956.

Robert W. Hughes, Dwight L. King, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

A.W. Watson, Salt Lake City, for respondents.

CROCKETT, Justice.

J. Hensley Cottrell sued for malicious prosecution, arising out of a prior criminal action wherein defendants had charged him with the felony of embezzlement,[1] which was dismissed before trial upon motion of the State. A jury answered interrogatories and rendered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stickle v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Newton v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In Re Richard's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Leavitt v. ThurstonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API