Legal Opinion

People v. Floyd

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1926No. Docket No. 1273PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant was convicted on each of seven counts contained in two indictments which charged him with the crime of embezzlement of public funds while acting as recorder of Culver City. Under additional counts of one of such indictments he was also convicted on each of two counts which charged him with the destruction and mutilation of public records; also on each of four counts therein which charged him with the crime of falsifying a public record. Defendant appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court on a verdict of conviction as to each of such counts, as well as from the order of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DurkeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. HoltzendorffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. State v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bodenhamer v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. WaltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API