Legal Opinion

People v. Hurst

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

■ Exceptions from recorder’s court of Detroit. (Swift, D.)- Embezzlement. Despondent was convicted. The: facts- are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

/ Campbell, C. J.

Despondent was convicted of embezzling $275, alleged to have been put in his hands by.one-Lena J. Smith as her agent. Despondent was a lawyer, and. also engaged more or less in renting houses. Mrs. Smith formed his acquaintance while seeking to rent a house. .She-got him to lend $400 for her, which he did on mortgage. She further said she had $1,100 more to lend. He said he-had a place for $700, which he actually lent on first mort*277;gage. He also showed her a letter from a man who had a .parcel of 40 acres of land to sell, and he wanted her to give him the money to buy it, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. GallandMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McDonald.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Fleener v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. People v. HopperMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. MarcoOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. American Life Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API