Conway v. Saudi Arabian Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACK, District Judge.
On this date, came on to be heard Defendants Saudi Arabian Oil Company [“Saudi Arabian”] and Aramco Services Company [“Aramco”] Motion for Summary Judgment and the Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. JURISDICTION
This cause of action is in federal court as a result of a removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), § 1446, §§ 1602 et seq.
II. FACTS
Plaintiff, John Conway, entered into negotiations with Defendants. On or about June 3, 1991, John Conway accepted a conditional employment offer with…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Diane D. Gutterman v. Regan Daughtry Gutterman and John S. Gutterman, Iii, Infants, and H.J. Davidson, Jr., Co-Guardian Ad Litem of the Minor Children, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perez v. Alcoa Fujikura, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
- Bass v. HendrixDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Westfall v. GTE North Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996