Legal Opinion

Conway v. Saudi Arabian Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 4, 1994No. Civ. A. C-93-149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JACK, District Judge.

On this date, came on to be heard Defendants Saudi Arabian Oil Company [“Saudi Arabian”] and Aramco Services Company [“Aramco”] Motion for Summary Judgment and the Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. JURISDICTION

This cause of action is in federal court as a result of a removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), § 1446, §§ 1602 et seq.

II. FACTS

Plaintiff, John Conway, entered into negotiations with Defendants. On or about June 3, 1991, John Conway accepted a conditional employment offer with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Diane D. Gutterman v. Regan Daughtry Gutterman and John S. Gutterman, Iii, Infants, and H.J. Davidson, Jr., Co-Guardian Ad Litem of the Minor Children, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perez v. Alcoa Fujikura, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
  2. Bass v. HendrixDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  3. Westfall v. GTE North Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API