Perez v. Alcoa Fujikura, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BIERY, District Judge.
Before the Court are rather unusual questions which, because of the evolution of the global economy, may arise more frequently in the future. In particular, the Court has for consideration the defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or for summary Judgment, and motion for the application of Mexican law. After reviewing the record and the relevant law and finding a close call to be made, the Court concludes the defendants’ motion for the application of Mexican law should be denied, and their motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment under Texas law should be granted…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador LaurelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Lee v. Metrocare ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- Royal Ins. Co. of Am. v. Crowne Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Blue Cross of California v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.