Legal Opinion
Westfall v. GTE North Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 1, 1996No. 3:95-cv-00488PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MALONEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is opposed. After considering the motion, the response, the reply, the supplemental responses, and supplemental replies, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff Bonnie J. Westfall was employed by Defendants GTE North Incorporated and GTE Corporation as a manager of sales operations in GTE carrier markets in 1990. In April, 1994, GTE conducted an investigation…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hogan v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Ehrhardt v. Electrical & Instrumentation UnlimitedDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- Scribner v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Bankhead v. Lifeguard Ambulance Service, LLC d/b/a Lifeguard Ambulance ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019