Legal Opinion
Miller v. Steinbach
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 3, 1967No. 66 Civ. 356PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
In this action which has been brought derivatively on behalf and for the benefit of Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “BLH”), individually on plaintiff’s own behalf and representatively on behalf of all former BLH shareholders similarly situated with plaintiff except for those shareholders who participated in the transactions complained of, defendants have moved for an order: (a) under Rules 9(a) and 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure striking all matter from the complaint purporting to state a claim derivately on behalf of…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.