Legal Opinion
Homer v. Crown Cork and Seal Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 5, 1928No. [No. 49, January Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPabke, J.
The appellants, Francis T. Homer, Luther M. R. Willis and Bertha F. Goldenberg, were the complainants, and the appellees, the Crown Cork and Seal Company of Baltimore City, a corporation, and the chairman of its board of directors and its vice-president, and its directors, were the defendants, in .a bill of complaint filed with the object of enjoining the corporate defendant, its officers and agents, from committing any act whatsoever looking towards or in furtherance of the sale of the corporate assets of the corporation as a whole, and particularly from holding the meeting of stockholders…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Conmar Products Corp. v. Universal Slide Fastener Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Rettinger ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. PierpontNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Ahlenius v. Bunn & Humphreys, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- American General Corp. v. CampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.