Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Wyrick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 1892No. 637PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

Huffman sued "Wyriek on two promissory notes, executed by the latter to one Flora B. Vancleve. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff and the payee of said notes intermarried, and she subsequently died intestate, without issue, leaving the plaintiff as her only heir at law; that her estate was duly administered in the Steuben Circuit Court, and upon final settlement the administrator, pursuant to an order of said court, assigned and transferred the notes to the plaintiff as part of the assets of the estate.

An answer was filed consisting of three paragraphs, the first of which was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. GillenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Warring v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Roberts v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Fox v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Armstrong v. CaesarIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Benson, Admx. v. RosineOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Paxton v. Vincennes Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Hatfield v. MahoneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API