Legal Opinion

James v. Gillen

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1892No. 200PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Crumpacker, J. —

Mary Gillen filed a claim against the estate of Sarah Daugherty, deceased, of which John H. James is administrator, for work and labor performed for said decedent from the first day of August, 1883, to the 30th ■day of August, 1887. The cause was tried by a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the claimant, upon which judgment was rendered.

The evidence showed that the decedent and her brother, Henry Daugherty, were both unmarried and past the meridian of life, and they owned adjoining farms in Putnam county. ' There was a house upon the decedent’s farm, and she and her…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. . HutchinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Woods v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Smith v. DenmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Dodson v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Price v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wainwright Trust Co. v. KinderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Crampton v. LoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Sargent v. FolandOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Walting v. BROWN, EXTRX., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API