Legal Opinion

Hundemer v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1969No. 10775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, P. J.

Lawrence Hundemer was a patient in Grood Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati, which was operated by Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc., where he was recuperating from surgery. On the morning of November 19, 1963, at about 3:3'0 a. m., he was found to be in a state of shock. Under advice of a physician, a drug known as Levophed, a vasoconstrictor, was administered by intravenous infusion. The drug was added to a quantity of glucose and water and, thus, was given to Mr. Hundemer. During the course of this infusion, it was found to have infiltrated his arm, resulting eventually in a sloughing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. DowningNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Oberlin v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Oleksiw v. WeidenerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Grantham v. GoetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Renrick v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API