Legal Opinion

Grantham v. Goetz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1960No. Appeals, 172 and 173PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mk. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to remove a compulsory nonsuit. The plaintiff alleged malpractice on the part of the two appellee-doctors in the course of treatment given the appellant while he was a patient in a hospital in Beading, Pennsylvania.

The appellant suffered a severe chemical burn of the leg, as a result of the extravasation of a drug administered intravenously during the course of his treatment for severe shock. ITe charges the defendants with negligence, specifically, in failing to provide the attention and standard of care the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. MaffucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Robinson v. WirtsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Galbraith v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nolan v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Buchanan v. DowningNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. John F. Bogacki and Mary Ann Bogacki, a Partnership Doing Business as Royal Lanes v. American MacHine & Foundry Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Evanuik v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API