Legal Opinion

Marvin Kenneth Shue v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2016No. S-15-0187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORGEY, District Judge.

[¶ 1] Marvin Shue (hereinafter "Shue") filed a motion in the district court that can be read as both a motion to withdraw his guilty plea and a motion to reduce his sentence. The district court denied Shue's request to withdraw his guilty plea and concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to contemplate a sentence reduction. Shue now appeals the district court's decision, We find that the dis trict court did not have jurisdiction to rule on Shue's motion and that we, as a result, do not have jurisdiction to consider Shue's appeal.

ISSUE

RJ 21 Shue did not include a statement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Whitney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mark W. Hitz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steven Jacob Mitchell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Dana Lee Sherard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Roman G. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Sheldon Scott Buckingham v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Ismael Ruiz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API