Marvin Kenneth Shue v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FORGEY, District Judge.
[¶ 1] Marvin Shue (hereinafter "Shue") filed a motion in the district court that can be read as both a motion to withdraw his guilty plea and a motion to reduce his sentence. The district court denied Shue's request to withdraw his guilty plea and concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to contemplate a sentence reduction. Shue now appeals the district court's decision, We find that the dis trict court did not have jurisdiction to rule on Shue's motion and that we, as a result, do not have jurisdiction to consider Shue's appeal.
ISSUE
RJ 21 Shue did not include a statement…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Whitney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Mark W. Hitz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steven Jacob Mitchell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Dana Lee Sherard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Roman G. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Sheldon Scott Buckingham v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Ismael Ruiz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023