Legal Opinion

Roman G. Sanchez v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2017No. S-16-0245PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.

[¶1] Roman G. Sanchez filed a post-sentence motion to -withdraw his no contest plea. The district court denied his motion and he appeals. This Court concludes that the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider the motion and that this Court likewise lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

ISSUE

[¶2] The dispositive issue is whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction to consider Mr. Sanchez’s Motion to Withdraw Guilty/No Contest Plea.

FACTS

[¶3] Mr. Sanchez was charged with second-degree murder in 2008. He entered into a plea agreement and changed his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To HLL and KGS, Minor Children: CLB v. State of Wyoming, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Inman v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Patrick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Michael Sides, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API