Legal Opinion

Nixon v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2002No. 01-55PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd Luther Nixon appeals pro se from the district court’s order which denied his post-sentence and post-direct appeal motion to withdraw his guilty pleas filed pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 32(d). In that motion, Nixon raised several claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and a claim that the district court and his trial counsel failed to advise him about mitigation matters he could have presented during the sentencing phase of his capital case. In this appeal, Nixon raises those issues and the issue whether the district court erred by not conducting an evidentiary…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. MaresWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Van Haele v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Weldon v. Ramstad-HvassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Saunders v. HorneckerWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bonney v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API