Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Guenther

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2009No. 2008AP559-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report and recommendation of the referee, Reserve Judge John B. Murphy. Based on a stipulation between the parties, the referee found that Attorney Arik Guenther had committed three violations of the Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys. As discipline for those violations, the referee recommended that Attorney Guenther's license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for a period of nine months, that he be required, as a condition of any reinstatement of his license, to pay restitution to a former client in the amount of $3,227.27, and that he pay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Disciplinary Proceedings Against RayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API