Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ray
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of Referee Catherine M. Rottier for sanctions, pursuant to SCR 22.17(2). Attorney Virginia Rose Ray was found to have engaged in professional misconduct in the course of her practice of law in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The referee recommended a five-month suspension of her license to practice law, the payment of restitution, and the payment of the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR).
¶ 2. We approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the referee. However, we determine that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NorlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against LoudermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KrombachWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. WillihnganzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.