Radley v. Fish
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Willard Radley and Dedde Radley, individually and as next friends of their minor child Eric Radley, appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Knox County, Jabar, J.). They challenge the summary judgment (Atwood, J.) entered in favor of Russell Fish on the Rad-leys’ complaint. The Radleys contend that Fish owed a duty of care to Eric, and that the Superior Court erred by concluding that Fish did not owe Eric a duty to keep Fish’s lot safe or to warn Eric of any hazardous condition on Fish’s lot. Unpersuaded by the Radleys’ contentions, we affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶2]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cameron v. PepinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Collomy v. School Administrative District No. 55.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Timothy Bell v. Randall DawsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Reid v. Town of Mount VernonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Estate of Cilley v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Bonin v. CrepeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Estate of Cummings v. DavieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.