Legal Opinion

Radley v. Fish

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 19, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Willard Radley and Dedde Radley, individually and as next friends of their minor child Eric Radley, appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Knox County, Jabar, J.). They challenge the summary judgment (Atwood, J.) entered in favor of Russell Fish on the Rad-leys’ complaint. The Radleys contend that Fish owed a duty of care to Eric, and that the Superior Court erred by concluding that Fish did not owe Eric a duty to keep Fish’s lot safe or to warn Eric of any hazardous condition on Fish’s lot. Unpersuaded by the Radleys’ contentions, we affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cameron v. PepinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. Collomy v. School Administrative District No. 55.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Timothy Bell v. Randall DawsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. Reid v. Town of Mount VernonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Estate of Cilley v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Bonin v. CrepeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Estate of Cummings v. DavieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API