Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Florence Stanley, individually and as mother and next friend of Laura Stanley, appeals from a summary judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) rendered in favor of defendants, Tilcon Maine, Inc., Tilcon Minerals, Inc., and Tilcon Quarries Maine, Inc. The Superior Court concluded that plaintiffs claim is barred by the Recreational Use Statute (14 M.R.S.A. § 159-A (1980 & Supp.1987)).

On appeal, plaintiff contends that a minor’s claim based on the common law doctrine of attractive nuisance 1 is not barred by the statute. Alternatively plaintiff contends that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. BillingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Graybar Electric Co. v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Thurston v. 3K Kamper Ko., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Dickinson v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Robbins v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Director of Bureau of Labor Standards v. Diamond Brands, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Maine Green Party v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API