Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 7828SC38PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

“When a verdict is set aside for error or errors in law, committed during the trial, and not as a matter of discretion, the par ty thereby aggrieved may appeal, provided the error or errors are specifically designated.” Akin v. Bank, 227 N.C. 453, 455, 42 S.E. 2d 518, 519 (1947); accord, Wells v. Bissette, 266 N.C. 774, 147 S.E. 2d 210 (1966); McNeill v. McDougald, 242 N.C. 255, 87 S.E. 2d 502 (1955); Powers v. City of Wilmington, 177 N.C. 361, 99 S.E. 102 (1919). Here, the supposed errors which induced the court’s action in setting aside the verdict were specifically stated by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Hood v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Phipps v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Town of Winton v. ScottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. McCann v. TravisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Beck v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API